Archive for the ‘Washington Personal Injury Law’ Category
Washington Supreme Court Rules On Judicial Immunity
January 17th, 2010 | 
Author: By Seattle Personal Injury Lawyer Scott Eller
Last month the Washington Supreme Court issued a decision in a case in which the Court considered an issue of judicial immunity.[1] A sheriff deputy escorted an inmate from a courtroom to the jail on the instructions of the judge. She did not handcuff the inmate. The inmate brook away and ran for the entrance. He lowered his shoulder and charged into a person in the courthouse, injury him. That person brought suit. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in 
Tags: 
Courts Reject Injury Attorney’s Fees as too High
A recent Court of Appeals decision upheld the trial court’s ruling that attorney fees requested by an injury attorney were unreasonable.[1] Read the rest of this entry »
Case Law and Personal Injury
It is common in politics to criticize courts for “legislating from the bench”. The argument is that courts have no role in formulating broad public policy.
For most of the legal history of this and other English speaking countries in many areas of the law there was no legislation on point. Instead, the courts developed rules over time. These laws are often referred to as common law. Read the rest of this entry »
Duty and Forseeability
Negligence is “conduct which falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk”. [1]
Duty and standard of care.
The standard of conduct can arise from common law principles. It can also be prescribed by legislative enactment.[2] Read the rest of this entry »
Proximate Cause
Proximate cause includes both cause in fact and legal cause.[1] A cause in fact is a cause but for which the accident would not have happened.[2] A legal cause is a cause in fact that warrants legal liability as a matter of social policy.[3]
A cause is “proximate” only if it is both a cause in fact and a legal cause because not all causes in fact warrant the imposition of legal liability. Read the rest of this entry »
Personal Injury Damages
Under Washington personal injury law an injury victim must prove negligence and proximate causation.
After establishing negligence and proximate causation the injury victim must prove damages. There are various types of damages that are recoverable upon proof by the injury victim. The compensable elements of personal injury damages under Washington personal injury law are established by case law and statute.
Claims Against Family Members
There is no family tort immunity in Washington.[1] Also, insurance policies that exclude coverage for injury caused by family members are unenforceable under Washington law.[2] The same is true for insurance policy exclusions of family members for UIM coverage.[3]
Comparative Fault in Washington
Until 1973 Washington followed a rule of contributory negligence under which is an injury victim was partially at fault, even partially, this was a complete defense to the injury claim. This lead to many harsh results and exceptions to the rule.[1]
A comparative negligence statute went into effect in 1974 that eliminated the contributory negligence rule of a complete bar to recovery and replaced it with a rule that the plaintiff’s claim is lowered by the proportion of the plaintiff’s fault.[2]
Liability of Minors for Personal Injury Claims
Many assume that parents are “automatically” liable for damages caused by their children. Washington personal injury law is not so simple.
Traffic Citations and Fault
Many assume that a driver involved in an automobile accident who is cited by police is automatically liable. Under Washington tort law this is not true. Read the rest of this entry »
