Contact Us
206-801-1188
425-641-8010

Toll Free
877-50-INJURY
(877-504-6587)

Free Confidential
Personal Injury Case Evaluation



Eller Law Firm on Facebook

Wrongful Death Survival Statute

In addition to seeking “actual pecuniary loss” on behalf of statutory beneficiaries Washington has three survival statutes under which a deceased’s injury claim may be brought.  Washington has three wrongful death survival statutes, a general survival statute and two that relate to personal injury claims.

General Survival Statute

Under the general survival statute the personal representative may bring actions of behalf of the estate for injuries that did not result in death.[1] The estate is the beneficiary of any recovery and any recovery is an asset of the estate.[2] The estate is compensated as if the decedent had survived to life expectancy.

The general survival statute does permits a decedent’s personal representative to recover noneconomic damages on behalf of the decedent’s estate for the decedent’s pain and suffering, anxiety, emotional distress, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium.[3]

“Death by Personal Injury” Statute

Under the “death by personal injury” survival statute the personal representative can bring an action for pain and suffering for injuries that caused death, but only for statutorily designated beneficiaries.[4] Surviving spouses and children do not have to prove dependency for claims under this provision[5] and damages for pain and suffering are allowed. [6]

Death of Child Statute

Parents of a minor child or a child upon whom they are dependent may bring a claim under RCW 4.24.010. The parents of a viable but unborn child may bring a claim under the statute.[7] Recoverable damages include medical expenses, loss of love and companionship, and for destruction of the parent child relationship.


[1] RCW 4.20.046(1); Higbee v. Shorewood Osteopathic Hosp., 105 Wn.2d 33 (1985).

[2] Tait v. Wahl, 97 Wn. App. 765 (1999).

[3] Id.

[4] Id.; RCW 4.20.020.

[5] Higbee.

[6] Tait.

[7] Guard v. Jackson, 132 Wn.2d 660 (1997); Cavazos v. Franklin, 73 Wn.App. 116 (1994); Moen v. Hanson, 85 Wn.2d 597 (1975).

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Personal Injury Attorney
Injury Case Evaluation
Free personal injury attorney case evaluation.
  • Washington Courts Rule on Landlord Liability for Dog Bite Injury
     Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. A recent Washington Court of Appeals decision considered arguments for landlord liability for dog bite injury.  The plaintiff was injured in a common areas by a dog owned by another tenant. The plaintiff claimed that the dog had attacked other […]
  • Court Dismisses Case for Improper Service of Summons and Complaint
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. In a recent decision the Washington Court of Appeals considered an issue of service of a summons and complaint. [1] Proper service of the summons and complaint is a prerequisite to the court obtaining jurisdiction over a party, and a […]
  • Medical Malpractice Statute Notice Requirements Declared Unconstitutional
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. Washington medical malpractice statutes had required an injury claimant to both obtain a certificate of merit from an expert before filing suit and to give 90 days notice to a health care provider before filing suit. Last year the Washington […]
  • Landowner Duty to Police in Washington
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. In a recent premises liability case Division One of the Washington Court of Appeals considered what duty, if any, a landowner owes to a police officer.[1] On the night of December 20, 2005, a King County Sheriff’s Department Deputy entered […]
  • Woman Claiming Injury Unsuccessfully Argues Appeal Without an Attorney
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. A woman who fell and was in injured appealed the trial court results. She unsuccessfully argued her appeal without the assistance of an attorney. She injured her ankle when she slipped on a substance on the floor in a Safeway […]
  • Person Who Fell on Wet Floor Sign Wins Appeal
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. A customer slipped and fell on a fallen wet floor sign. The trial court dismissed the case on Petsmart’s motion for summary judgment. The Washington Court of Appeals reversed. The customer several minutes browsing the dog toy aisle. He caught […]
  • Auto Accident Injury Victim’s Default Judgment Set Aside
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. A woman injured in a motor vehicle accident served the Washington Secretary of State because she was unable to locate the other driver to effect personal service.  The trial court entered a default judgment.  The court awarded $12,000 in general […]
  • Oil Slick from Truck Allegedly Causes Accident
    Our law firm was not involved in the personal injury lawsuit described in this article. The Washington Court of Appeals ruled on a case in which it was alleged that an oil slick from a truck on the interstate highway caused a vehicle to loose control and leave the highway, rolling over several times.[1] A […]
    Personal Injury Attorney serving entire Puget Sound

  • King County including Seattle, Kent, Auburn, Renton, Federal Way, Bellevue, Bothell
  • Pierce County including Tacoma, Puyallup, Lakewood
  • Snohomish County including Everett, Lynnwood, Edmonds, Marysville

Lawyers blogs Resources Medical Malpractice Legal Resources - Regional information on medical personal injury resources.